inSession / Features / The Case
Cause 2026-CV-00419 · Maycomb County Superior Court

One case. Six modules.

Everything on this page happens inside a single lawsuit. Read it once, then take a seat in it. Five minutes, live, against counsel who does not go easy.

§ Liability
All or nothing
Liability is binary. If the jury accepts the non-deployment was correct, the plaintiff recovers nothing.

That is the question every seat below is arguing about.

§ Preliminary Instructions Run. 0:59 · Press play
§ Instructions
Before you sit
Preliminary instructions from the inSession team.
§ The Matter

An airbag that did not deploy.

Tuesday afternoon outside Maycomb. Our plaintiff is driving south on Ridgeline at about forty miles an hour. A truck comes through the intersection against the light, and the front of the car goes into it square. A head-on impact, not a glancing one.

The front airbag never fires. The plaintiff goes into the steering wheel, and the injury is to the neck: pain that has not resolved in the fourteen months since. There is no fracture to point at and nothing on a scan that settles it. Treatment did not start until two days after the collision. And there is a 2019 neck injury from lifting at work: same region, seven years earlier.

The car is totalled. The airbag module comes out of it intact, and its recorded data is now the whole case. Discovery is closed. Both sides have their experts, both sides have read the same download from the same module, and both sides have built a very different story out of it. Everything you can do on this page happens inside that lawsuit: the same record, the same people, six different seats at the table.

§ The Disputed Question Stated plainly

For the Plaintiff

The plaintiff was struck while driving. The front airbag did not deploy and they struck the steering wheel. Plaintiff says it should have fired.

For the Defense

The defense says the crash was not severe enough to warrant deployment, because the recorded change in velocity sat below the threshold.

§ Take a Seat

Six modules in this case.

Same record, same people, six different places to sit. Five minutes each, and nobody goes easy.

I.

Oral Arguments

You oppose a four-month continuance and the bench pushes back.

You arePlaintiff's counsel, opposing a four-month continuance
You faceJudge Fitzgerald or Judge Lawson
Runtime5 minutes
Argue the motion
II.

Witness Examination

You take the reconstruction report apart at the openings you find in it.

You areCounsel, examining the crash reconstruction expert
You faceThe expert, and opposing counsel
Runtime5 minutes
Work the expert
III.

The Witness Stand

Counsel works the gaps in your sworn record while you answer under oath.

You areThe plaintiff, being cross-examined
You faceAngela Cramer, for the defense
Runtime5 minutes
Take the stand
IV.

Mediation

You trade offers against a demand, an authority cap and a floor only you hold.

You areLead counsel, in private mediation
You faceThe neutral, Hill or Broward
Runtime5 minutes
Sit in caucus
V.

Voir Dire

You question the venire and decide where your strikes go.

You areCounsel, in voir dire
You faceThe venire
Runtime5 minutes
Pick the jury
↑ Sit here after voir dire
VI.

Opening / Closing Statements

You argue profits over people to the four you just seated.

You areCounsel, arguing profits over people
You faceThe jury you just picked
Runtime5 minutes
Open to the jury
§ Cause 2026-CV-00419 First Chair, Inc. Patent Pending Maycomb County Superior

This one is ours.
The next one is yours.

These six rooms run on a case we wrote. inSession runs them on the case on your desk: your record, your witnesses, your venire, as many times as it takes. Early access is open to trial attorneys, litigation teams and law schools.